Our approach overviewThe 6M Sales OSCodificationWinning scenariosMinimum Viable Repeatability
MINIMUM VIABLE REPEATABILITY

What have you
actually proved?

Revenue matters. So does understanding the conditions that produced it and whether the business can reproduce them.

01 /

Define the claim.

Minimum Viable Repeatability is a practical gate before adding scale. It asks whether a defined commercial approach has enough supporting evidence to justify the next investment. The claim needs boundaries: a scenario, a route to market, a selling role and a buying process.

This is not proof that every market will behave the same way. It is a reasoned decision about what the business is ready to do next, with the limitations made explicit.

02 /

Examine five kinds of evidence.

  • Demand: can the team find and engage buyers in the defined situation?
  • Progression: do comparable buyers make meaningful commitments through the buying process?
  • Independence: can someone other than the founder or key expert execute with an understood level of support?
  • Economics: do acquisition effort, discounting and delivery requirements support a viable approach?
  • Customer value: do customers receive the outcome that justified buying?

These dimensions need to agree. Independent selling with poor economics is not a sound basis for scale. Neither is a stream of wins that creates avoidable customer failure.

03 /

Make the evidence honest.

Use counts alongside percentages. A conversion rate from a handful of opportunities needs a different interpretation from a stable pattern across many comparable decisions. Separate founder-network opportunities from those created through the intended motion.

Record assistance, concessions, product commitments and unusual delivery work. Treat unfinished buying cycles as unfinished evidence. The appropriate observation period depends on the market and buying process; a calendar deadline cannot make a result mature.

04 /

Choose how to grow.

  • Scale selectively when the evidence supports a defined investment. Specify the role, market and conditions.
  • Continue proving when the approach looks promising but key evidence is incomplete. Name the unknown and the next review point.
  • Fix the constraint when a weakness is clear. Give the owner the authority and support to address it.

The aim is a better decision, not a ceremonial pass mark. We agree the evidence and decision criteria around your business before interpreting the results.

Read the full argument.

Minimum Viable Repeatability: the real gate before you scale ↗
LET’S TALK

What’s standing between
you and your next stage?

Let’s work it out ↗